Almost a fifth of all companies in the FTSE 350 do not
have sufficient independent directors, according to a new
report.
Under the UK Corporate Governance Code, listed companies
should have boards with at least three non-executive directors,
two of whom should have no financial or personal ties to the
company. According to the Corporate Governance Review by Grant
Thornton, 19.1% of companies did not comply with this
requirement of the Code in 2011, making it the most common form
of non-compliance with the code.
The other most common reasons for non-compliance were: failure
to meet remuneration committee membership criteria (12.1%);
failure to meet audit committee membership criteria (11.7%);
non-independent chairman appointed during the year (8.7%);
failure to meet nomination committee membership criteria
(6.4%); no senior independent director appointed (5%), and;
role of chair and chief executive combined (4.7%).
Other highlights include:
'A significant minority of UK listed companies could still
improve the quality of their reporting,' said Chris Hodge, Head
of Corporate Governance at the Financial Reporting Council. 'In
'explaining', it is not enough to simply say non-compliance
suits one's business model: stakeholders deserve to know
exactly why this is the case and what arrangements ensure that,
despite noncompliance, the business and their interests
are protected.
'More generally, companies need to consider the reader when
preparing their annual report. Boilerplate may tick the boxes
but it does not give the colour or the flavour to bring a
business alive.'
Released by ICSA 24 November 2011.